Belgium's New Regulations Failed to Get Rid of Lootboxes

Belgium is one of the first countries in Europe to have banned lootboxes. At least on paper, because Leon Y. Xiao of the University of Computer Science in Copenhagen has shown that the Belgian regulations on the mechanic are not only not respected, but the ban itself may not have been the best idea.

Lootboxes are still alive in Belgium

In his paper (via OSF Preprints) the researcher reports that of the 100 most popular titles in the App Store in the first half of 2022, 82 included lootboxes in one form or another.

Xiao also compared the list of the one hundred top-earning apps for iOS devices in Belgium with data from the UK and China. In the former case, seventy-one games were present in both countries' lists, and when narrowed down to the top fifty, forty-two (or 84%). Given that the regulations have been in force for four years now, that's not much of a difference, especially since that's how much time publishers were given to adjust to the new regulations.

Banning lootboxes is bad for players and honest developers

Of course, in part this may be due to Belgium's insufficient enforcement efforts. After all, some developers may have broken the law not intentionally, but out of ignorance (although this may come as a surprise, since at one time the Belgian ban has made waves in the game industry).

Related:One of Steam's hits will never go free-to-play because devs want to protect REPO fans from the biggest evil: microtransactions

Perhaps the Belgian government, in cooperation with Apple and Google, among others, and leading publishers, could try to make developers more aware of the ban. For example, in the form of notifications or questions about lootboxes when applying to add apps to the App Store, Google Play, etc.

Nevertheless, Xiao believes that getting rid of lootboxes from a country is "virtually impossible". Moreover in its current form, the Belgian ban does more harm than good.

1. First of all, it puts to sleep the vigilance of "consumers, parents and lawmakers", who can expect the elimination of lootboxes from Belgium. Meanwhile, only some of the more "morally responsible" publishers have withdrawn their games from the country, leaving games with potentially even more incentive to spend (and thus, as it were, also giving them an unfair advantage in the market).
2. Second, while an effective ban would prevent extreme cases of lootbox spending, its introduction also affects players. Even if the games they are interested in have not been blocked, the inability to spend - and I write this without sarcasm - really small amounts of money per month on a game can effectively spoil the fun of mobile games (for example, forcing long waits for a re-session with the game).
3. Third and finally, a formal "ban" on lootboxes can have the forbidden fruit effect, paradoxically increasing the interest of younger players in games with lootboxes. In addition, it discourages people who have a problem with overspending in games from seeking help, since it is "criminalized" from the legal point of view.

Belgium showed how (not) to ban lootboxes?

In the context of these and other enforcement problems Xiao concludes that the lootbox ban solution used in Belgium should not be a model for other countries. It is significant in that more and more countries are taking a stand against random content in video games. Some governments and are preparing their own regulations.

It is also worth recalling that the Belgian initiative has affected the policies of some publishers. For example, EA Sports has introduced we won't see them at all.

• policies
• analyses and research
• microtransactions
• law
• lootboxes
• AND
• iOS